Our team provides expert testimony and speaking engagements grounded in years of hands-on experience building, researching, and advising on AI systems and technology platforms.
We bring credibility through published research, real-world implementation experience, and recognized credentials in AI auditing, privacy, and financial compliance.
Three Pillars of Expert Qualification
What We Offer
Expert Witness Testimony
Testimony on AI capabilities, technology standards, and industry practices.
Conference Keynotes and Panels
Engaging presentations on AI, governance, and technology trends.
Corporate Education Sessions
Board and executive briefings on AI adoption and risk.
Regulatory and Legislative Briefings
Expert input for policy development and regulatory proceedings.
Academic Guest Lectures
Research-backed instruction for law, business, and technology programs.
Podcast and Media Appearances
Accessible expert commentary on AI, technology, and governance.
Selected Publications
Our expert testimony is backed by a published research record spanning AI, law, and computational modeling.
GPT-4 Passes the Bar Exam
Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A, 2024. Katz, Bommarito, Gao & Arredondo.
GPT as Knowledge Worker: A Zero-Shot Evaluation of (AI) CPA Capabilities
2023. Bommarito, Bommarito, Katz & Katz.
A General Approach for Predicting the Behavior of the Supreme Court
PLOS ONE, 2017. Katz, Bommarito & Blackman.
Legal Informatics
Cambridge University Press, 2021. Katz, Dolin & Bommarito.
Measuring the Complexity of the Law: The United States Code
Artificial Intelligence and Law, 2014. Katz & Bommarito.
How We Engage
Frequently Asked Questions
- What qualifies your team as expert witnesses?
- Our experts bring a peer-reviewed research record spanning AI, law, and computational systems, with work cited over 3,800 times in the academic literature. Professional credentials in accounting, privacy, and AI auditing complement deep technical expertise, supporting qualification under Daubert, Frye, and state equivalents.
- What topics can your team provide expert testimony on?
- Our expertise spans artificial intelligence (capabilities, limitations, standard of care), technology strategy and market standards, computational modeling and simulation, AI auditing and governance frameworks, privacy and data protection (US and EU regimes), data licensing and intellectual property in AI, financial compliance, and financial technology.
- What types of speaking engagements do you accept?
- We accept conference keynotes and panels, corporate education sessions, regulatory and legislative briefings, academic guest lectures, podcast and media appearances, and board-level technology briefings. Past appearances include BBC World Service, Wired, LawNext with Bob Ambrogi, State Bar of Michigan, and Mozilla/Eleuther dataset convenings.
- How do you prepare for expert testimony engagements?
- We bring the same rigor to testimony that we apply to our research and advisory work. This includes thorough review of relevant materials, independent analysis grounded in published methodology, and clear communication of complex technical concepts. Our experts are prepared for qualification under Daubert, Frye, and state equivalents, with published research providing a strong foundation for admissibility under FRE 702.
Related Services
Related Insights
An independent evidence review of Oracle's $43.1 billion tax abatement application under Michigan Public Act 198: the statutory six-month commencement rule, the county's own permit record, the consent judgment, principal findings, and recommended actions — revised July 18, 2026 after the Township Board's July 14 and July 17 votes, with the full 46-page report available for download.
The Proposed ITC Oneida–Sabine Lake 345 kV Transmission LineAn independent, reproducible route and environmental analysis of ITC's seven published alternatives for the Oneida–Sabine Lake 345 kV line in central Michigan — scored on the Act 30 factors with and without House Bill 5940's freeway credit, stress-tested across a million weightings, and resolved township by township. Revised September 2026; full 41-page report and explainer video.
Independent Traffic & Siting Analysis of the Proposed Chicago Bears StadiumA public-data traffic analysis of the proposed Bears stadium at Arlington Park: roughly 32,000 game-day vehicle trips, 112 local-street bottlenecks that persist in every mode-share scenario, the Metra surge-service gap, and equity concentration on the impact corridors — with five adoptable recommendations. Full 55-page report available for download.
Predicting the Supreme Court: AI Meets Legal OutcomesHow our machine learning research achieved breakthrough results in predicting Supreme Court decisions, and what it means for the future of legal AI.